Art-Test interviewed by Geopop after the controversy over the 14th century panel painting exported to Switzerland
A few days ago, we were delightfully invited by journalist Alessandra Lanza, editor at the popular science outlet Geopop (geopop.it), to discuss a precise and fundamental aspect of our work: “How do you study a work of art to determine if it is authentic?”
Geopop is a well-known science communication platform, especially among young people, who find its content an invaluable study aid and a rich source of in-depth topics. Its YouTube channel boasts over 3 million subscribers—what better opportunity to explain our work in simple yet clear terms?
The journalist reached out to us following the controversial issue of the “nulla osta” (export license) granted to a work later revealed to be an authentic 14th-century painting (not 19th-century, as stated in the export documents). She asked us: What can science do during the study phase to distinguish a fake from an original work?
It’s important to clarify that our contribution did not address the ministerial decision but rather what we mean by “authenticating a work of art”: understanding—based on the work’s conservation history and the documents provided—whether the artifact is compatible with an ancient piece or if it is a modern stylistic exercise. Before declaring something a “forgery,” it is essential to thoroughly analyze the relationship between the work, its conservation history, and its documentation.
As always, it was a pleasure for us to share our work. You can read our full interview here: https://www.geopop.it/scambiato-un-3-per-un-8-litalia-perde-un-dipinto-del-300-da-500k-euro-come-si-datano-le-opere-darte/
